<var id="U5JP"><ruby id="U5JP"></ruby></var>
<menuitem id="U5JP"></menuitem>
<var id="U5JP"></var>
<ins id="U5JP"><dl id="U5JP"><thead id="U5JP"></thead></dl></ins>
<thead id="U5JP"><dl id="U5JP"></dl></thead><menuitem id="U5JP"></menuitem><cite id="U5JP"><dl id="U5JP"><listing id="U5JP"></listing></dl></cite>
<listing id="U5JP"><ruby id="U5JP"></ruby></listing>
<var id="U5JP"></var>
<cite id="U5JP"></cite>

Why Nuclear Plants are a safe zone from terrorist attacks

Nuclear power plant

Possible aircraft attack

There has been a lot of contemplation over the consequences of occurrence of an attack by a large aircraft similar to the 2001 World Trade Centre attack in New York. This time the target being a nuclear facility aiming at radioactive materials. Studies show that nuclear reactors would be robust as compared to any other civil installations used to resist such attacks. A thorough study financed by the US department of Energy and conducted by US Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) concluded that the US reactor would be strong enough to withstand attacks from large commercial aircraft.


Lack of Australian nuclear plant almost immoral: Peter Cosgrove

The Former defence force chief Peter Cosgrove has pleaded for Australia to embrace nuclear power, criticising the “daily scrapping” between politicians about climate change.

Addressing a business breakfast in Perth, General Cosgrove said strong action was crucial and it was “almost immoral” to export uranium to less technologically advanced and stable countries to use in nuclear power plants while refusing to have one in Australia: (more…)

Warming to Nuclear Power

The Age yesterday released an Age/Nielsen poll demonstrating that 49% of Australians believed nuclear should be on the nation’s list of potential power options, with 43% opposed.


This is a major change from a level of just 38% in a 2006 Newspoll, with 51 per cent opposed.


The Real Target is 97%

With all the political talk about emissions targets, it is hard to get a solid reference point.? Here is one such reference.? Taking?the?long term sustainable emissions level from the?Stern Review (UK?Government 2007), we find that a 97% emissions cut will ultimately be?required in Australia’s case.


亚博博彩可靠| 亚博体育存款最强| 亚博座位| 亚博体育最新版本| 亚博体育app在哪里下载软件| 亚博体育推荐| 亚博体育如何取消投注| 皇冠和亚博| 乌鲁木齐亚博会时间| 亚博体育取款方式资讯| 亚博注册| 亚博体育是正规| 亚博中心钱包| 亚博娱乐用户登录app| 亚博体育赞助阿根廷| 亚博联盟合营计划| 登录亚博体育| 亚博体育202资讯| 亚博app地址| 亚博zippo金| 亚博体育软件app| 亚博体育手机登录| 亚博体育官网下载地址| 亚博体育推荐| 亚博体育中心钱包| 亚博体育备用网址| 亚博微信交流群| 亚博体育app还能用| 亚博体育如何取现| 亚博体育手机下载| 亚博体育ios下载苹果版| 苟亚博| 亚博体育苹果| 亚博体育app在哪里下载| 亚博手机官网| 中国亚博体育投注| 亚博体育在哪里| 亚博体育的网址| 亚博体育官网贵宾登录| 亚博体育app2.0| 苹果手机版亚博娱乐| http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccl8PmU/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/ccc1860A/51881.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccyQdbu/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccFxR6U/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/ccc2sQWR/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/ccclTTmG/